thanks, you are obviously drawing a reservoir of work in producing these so regularly, I appreciate the effort to publish here as a keen student at your feet, at nearly 60 this is no mean feat. And so I wonder, have you material to come dealing with (1) Christopher Beckwith (I am thinking more about his book on the Scythians -- see m ignorant review at https://whyweshould.substack.com/p/christopher-i-beckwiths-the-scythian)
and (20 Julian Barbour, also his latter book The Janus Point (which has a handy PDF on the history of thermodynamics as a supplement. via http://www.platonia.com/ )
Which I mentioned because the worked helped dispel any lingering effect of the Newtownian Space-time grid or crystal, which is perhaps indicated in your quote by Windelband, on my thinking. Which is all now tensegrity-like.
I've heard of Julian Barbour and was suspicious of his book about the denial of the reality of time, but after getting your message I looked up his website and there was quite a bit that was interesting there. I am revising my opinion of Barbour. I haven't previously heard of Beckwith, but I will look him up. I haven't written anything about either of them, but when a new influence enters into my thinking it eventually appears in my writing.
I've just digested some more of his book at https://whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com/minimum-viable-product.html but I do not deal with his main "point" just his framework. His, is an immanent position on time, not transcendental to the universe. My details may be wrong of course.
thanks, you are obviously drawing a reservoir of work in producing these so regularly, I appreciate the effort to publish here as a keen student at your feet, at nearly 60 this is no mean feat. And so I wonder, have you material to come dealing with (1) Christopher Beckwith (I am thinking more about his book on the Scythians -- see m ignorant review at https://whyweshould.substack.com/p/christopher-i-beckwiths-the-scythian)
and (20 Julian Barbour, also his latter book The Janus Point (which has a handy PDF on the history of thermodynamics as a supplement. via http://www.platonia.com/ )
Which I mentioned because the worked helped dispel any lingering effect of the Newtownian Space-time grid or crystal, which is perhaps indicated in your quote by Windelband, on my thinking. Which is all now tensegrity-like.
I've heard of Julian Barbour and was suspicious of his book about the denial of the reality of time, but after getting your message I looked up his website and there was quite a bit that was interesting there. I am revising my opinion of Barbour. I haven't previously heard of Beckwith, but I will look him up. I haven't written anything about either of them, but when a new influence enters into my thinking it eventually appears in my writing.
I've just digested some more of his book at https://whyweshould.loofs-samorzewski.com/minimum-viable-product.html but I do not deal with his main "point" just his framework. His, is an immanent position on time, not transcendental to the universe. My details may be wrong of course.